August 2007
A Legend Scoots On By
Phil Rizzuto–Hall of Fame shortstop, former Yankees broadcaster, and previously the oldest living Hall of Famer–has passed away, leaving behind him a rich legacy, and, also, a hopefully lasting wisdom.
"Scooter" was not the prototypical baseball star. He did not hit for power, batted .273 in his career, and–excepting a 200-hit MVP campaign in 1950–never had more than 169 hits in a season. Some have wondered, in fact, whether Rizzuto was truly deserving of his induction in 1994. In fact, when BaseballEvolution.com decided to create its own Hall of Fame in 2006, they did not include Rizzuto.
However, Rizzuto belonged to that special class of people whose statistics could only begin to express their accomplishments. Perhaps you know of whom I speak.
Does it not strike you as more than slightly uncoincidental that in Rizzuto’s thirteen years in the Majors, nine out of the thirteen years his teams went to the World Series? Or that seven of those teams won the Series? Or, perhaps, that ten out his thirteen teams ended up winning the pennant?
Fact was, "Scooter" Rizzuto was the invaluable sparkplug of his team. He was the team player who spent his at bats bunting and trying to get on base while everyone else was swinging for the fences. He stole bases. He walked more than he struck out. He was a spectacular defensive shortstop. He was a true fan favorite and clubhouse presence.
He was a true Hall-of-Famer, the one who would contribute while the statisticians weren’t looking.
Yet this type of player–perhaps due to Sabermetrics–is swiftly becoming a dying breed. They may contribute, but they just might not have the stats. But I ask you this: if you had a choice, and you had to choose, which would you rather take, a team of Adam Dunn’s or a team of Phil Rizzuto’s? Think carefully…
But while this type of player is becoming a dying breed, it is not all extinct. It is true, I have spoken before about Wally Joyner having many of these same characteristics. But there is another, a player still active today.
Perhaps you’ve heard of him. He plays shortstop for the St. Louis Cardinals. You know, the 2006 World Series MVP.
Perhaps, with Rizzuto’s death, we would take the opportunity to reflect on the type of player he was, to appreciate that player. It is not enough to recognize players such as Rizzuto, Joyner, and Eckstein as fan favorites; we must recognize the inherent value that comes from such players.
And what a value it is.
Four New Milestone Trackers
As Barry Bonds closed in on Hank Aaron’s home run record, I’m sure you noticed at least one site/newspaper maintaining coverage by some sort of countdown tracker. As you may well know, the pursuit is over, and Bonds is the new home run king.
But now that it’s over, it seems a blasted shame not to track other incoming milestones in a similar manner. As such, I’ve chosen four players approaching milestones to cover their pursuit. Two are quite conventional, covering milestones projected by the end of the season. The other two are, shall we say, rather unconventional , tracking milestones that shouldn’t occur until the next few seasons, and may not even occur at all.
First, the conventional milestones:
———————————————————————————————–
Jim Thome: March to 500 home runs
Current total: 490
Amount needed to reach goal: 10
Last Game: (8/12/07) 1 for 4, 2B, K
———————————————————————————————–
Ken Griffey, Jr.: March to 600 home runs
Current total: 590
Amount needed to reach goal: 10
Last Game: (8/12/07) 0 for 0, BB
———————————————————————————————–
And now the unconventional milestones:
———————————————————————————————–
Mike Mussina: March to 300 wins
Current total: 247
Amount needed to reach goal: 53
Seasons projected: 4
Last Game: (8/12/07) 7 2/3 IP, 8 hits, 2 ER, 0 BB, 6 K’s
————————————————————————————————
Luis Gonzalez: March to 3,000 hits
Current total: 2,478
Amount needed to reach goal: 522
Seasons projected: 3.5
Last Game: (8/13/07) 0 for 3, BB, K
Bonus Milestone: 33 away from 600 career 2B’s
———————————————————————————————–
Updates will commence each day of the season I happen to post something else. Though I didn’t include Manny Ramirez–as he’s not projected to reach 500 home runs until next season–I’ll make a milestone tracker as soon as he gets close.
All in all, it seems like close milestone coverage will not end anytime soon–at least on this blog.
The Record with a Half-Life
By now you know that Barry Bonds has hit his 756th career home run and eclipsed Hank Aaron’s previous record of 755 to become the new all-time home run champion. This has met with mixed response from the baseball community, for obvious reasons.
If there was any doubt, Barry Bonds has become–statistically–the greatest position player in Major League history. But while this feat tosses legitimate debate onto his Hall of Fame resume, this means almost nothing for the all-time home run record.
Why? Read this article, like I did, and find out.
Joyner named new Padres Hitting Coach; Padres hitters promptly go on rampage
Anyone who read my first post probably knew I would get a kick out of this.
The San Diego Padres have one of the top pitching staffs in the Major Leagues, one self-evident by premier closer Trevor Hoffman and two Cy Young Award candidates in Jake Peavy and Chris Young. What they don’t have, however, is consistent hitting, being–I believe–last in the league in those categories.
Enter Wally Joyner.
Teams with bad hitting records tend to fire their hitting coaches, and Joyner was the lucky beneficiary. So, too, apparently, were the Padres.
On August 2nd–Joyner’s first time in uniform–Padres hitters erupted in a never before seen outburst, blanking the Arizona Diamondbacks 11-0. Among other Padres hitters, recently acquired Morgan Ensberg snapped a season-long slump by hitting a pair of two-run home runs and going 3 for 4 on the night, lending credibility to the notion that vintage 2005 might be back.
The Padres went on to sweep the San Francisco Giants in the next series.
Thanks to Joyner?
I can’t be sure. But knowing me, I hope so.
Hall of Fame Case: Steve Garvey
*This is a "retro" article, one that I would have published had I not been on an extended leave of abscence.
———————————————————————————————–
“…you don’t make 10 All-Star Games without being one of the premier (and most famous) players of your generation. “
-Ken Gurnick, MLB.com writer, on Steve Garvey
Well, good point, Mr. Gurnick—but, without context, that’s really just a bunch of fluff.
Hold on, what’s that? You were expecting me to further elaborate on Mr. Gurnick’s comment?
Fat chance.
You see, while Steve Garvey was one of the most popular—and premier—players of the ‘70’s and ‘80’s, basing something like Hall candidacy on something as subjective as All-Star selections really has little to no value.
Don’t think All-Star selections are subjective? Well, in about June of ’06 I checked the state of the All-Star voting and discovered—to my surprise—that Red Sox centerfielder Coco Crisp was actually in the Top 15 in the outfield voting, despite the fact that he was hitting about .270/2/9 (Batting Average/Home runs/RBI) at the time.
Sheesh, if I were to take All-Star selections so liberally, I would have at least given the underrated Frank Catalonotto a sympathy vote to honor his great ability to hit for percentage. Thankfully, though, I have yet to crack in that regard.
Don’t take that incident as a one-time fluke. In 2005, Carlos Beltran managed an All-Star start despite average performance; in 2004, Ken Griffey, Jr. and Sammy Sosa received All-Star starts (And helped form a 500-home run outfield) despite performance well below the implied level.
So, in short, it’s really not worth my time and effort to expound on Garvey’s 10 All-Star appearances. My analysis, instead, will focus on three aspects which should help explain why I view Garvey as a Hall-of-Famer:
6 200-hit seasons
4 Gold Gloves
5 100-RBI seasons
My analysis, instead, will focus on the question of whether anyone has ever matched Garvey in these three categories.
Multiple 200-hit seasons and multiple Gold Glove winners
I decided to start here, as the list of multiple Gold Glove winners is far too long to post. As such, I decided to narrow the list to something more manageable, all the while furthering the aforementioned purpose.
Todd Helton
Hank Aaron
Curt Flood
Pete Rose
Tony Gwynn
Roberto Clemente
Don Mattingly
Cecil Cooper
Wade Boggs
Derek Jeter
Cal Ripken, Jr.
Alex Rodriguez
Kirby Puckett
Ichiro Suzuki
Bernie Williams
Steve Garvey
The names above shouldn’t be glossed over, as we’re just getting started. You may, however, note that most of the guys listed are either current or future Hall-of-Famers.
I then decided to further narrow the list by adding the final category.
Multiple 200-hit seasons, multiple Gold Gloves, and 5 100-RBI seasons
Todd Helton
Hank Aaron
Don Mattingly
Alex Rodriguez
Bernie Williams
Steve Garvey
Wow, that sure trimmed the field.
You see, when I first selected ‘5 100-RBI seasons’ to further narrow the list, my thoughts were that we’d see less names as I removed the singles hitters. Then again, not all the names removed were singles hitters, and I wasn’t expecting nearly so many names to leave.
Then again, it’s generally the singles hitters that rack up 200-hit seasons, and it’s generally the power hitters that rack up 100-RBI seasons. Doing both is a rare achievement.
I’m starting to see where this is going (I’m technically doing this analysis as I type), and it’s nowhere near what I was expecting. It’s probably for the best, in any case.
Trying to trim the list further, I narrowed one of the categories.
6 200-hit seasons, multiple Gold Gloves, and 5 100-RBI seasons
Steve Garvey
Whoa.
Whoa.
This was not what I expected when I started. I had thought that Aaron, Mays, Clemente, or one of many highly regarded players would step up to the plate and match Steve Garvey. In the end, all fall short.
For emphasis:
Steve Garvey is the only player in Major League history to have 6 200-hit seasons, 5 100-RBI seasons, and win 4 Gold Gloves. For that matter, he’s also the only player to match those standards of hitting and still win multiple Gold Gloves.
So when anyone ever asks you who was the most complete player you ever saw…
Whoa, what’s that? We were talking about the Hall of Fame?
I don’t think, after reading this analysis, that there should be any question that Steve Garvey belongs in the Hall of Fame. Beyond the aforementioned statistical goodness, Garvey was an exceptional hitter in the postseason and the former record-holder of the highest career fielding percentage by a first baseman who played 1,600 games (I don’t know who holds it now—Todd Helton?).
So, no, Crawly, Garvey wasn’t “a piece of garbage.”
It’s unfortunate that Garvey has been underrated over the years, as people have often taken his relative lack of power (At least to a first baseman) as a sign that was actually overrated. The truth is, however, that power is one the most overrated—if not the most overrated—aspects of baseball. It allows a player that has no actual clue with what he’s doing at the plate to simply swing away and let his physique turn him into something of a national icon. I mean, how else can you explain the popularity of Dave Kingman?
Speaking of national icons, we have the cases of Sammy Sosa and Mark McGwire. In all fairness, they really owe nothing else to their popularity than their power, and while it wouldn’t be fair to say they know nothing about hitting, it would hardly be a stretch to call them one-tool players (i.e. only exhibiting the tool of power).
Garvey, however, had none of those issues. Having 6 200-hit seasons is an achievement matched by only a handful of Hall-of-Famers, Ichiro, and Pete Rose—and having 5 100-RBI seasons is no easy feat, either. As I mentioned before, having the two statistics juxtaposed together is very rare, indeed. In fact, my limited research has only come up with one name, and that’s of Lou Gehrig.
Speaking of which, it’s probably not entirely fair to have included the official-looking Gold Glove into the mix. A number of Gold Glove choices can only be explained by subjectivity, and they’ve only been around since 1957, leaving a lot of good players in the dust. Then again, Garvey’s career fielding percentage of .9959 is indicative that the awards were quite deserved, so there should be no doubt he was fairly awarded. Then again, Gehrig was one of those pre-1957 players that likely would have been rewarded had the Gold Glove existed at the time, or at least that’s the indication of my sources. Given his power (Combined, yes, with equal hitting ability), however, odds are that Gehrig was actually the better player (But everyone already knew that).
But if we’re talking of the Hall of Fame, being compared solely with Gehrig is pretty lofty.
It’s unfortunate that Garvey was shafted in the recent Hall of Fame election, as it’s quite clear that he was quite deserving. He’s now going to have to face the unforgiving and thus far incorrigible Veteran’s Committee, leaving his eventual Hall of Fame chances in serious doubt.
Hopefully, they’ll come around, as support for guys like Ron Santo has slowly grown, though if Santo has actually encountered resistance, Garvey’s fate is far more uncertain.
It really shouldn’t have come to this. Unlike in some other cases, voters knew what they were doing when they gave Garvey 10 All-Star appearances. Hopefully, another, bronzed appearance lies in Garvey’s ultimate future.
A triumphant return?
As my limited (Judging from the amount of comments) audience might know, I have taken an extended leave of abscence from my MLB blogging. The reason for this may have been technical issues–which still deny me the ability to edit my posts, the time-consuming nature of my posts, some frustration at not being read (Hopefully minor), or the astonishing fact that there are other things I do in my life beyond posting. Shocking, I know.
All of that now gets kicked to the curb now that I’m back, hopefully with increased regular attendence. That said, my last posts left me in an uncomfortable quandrary as I had some glaring errors.
As readers must have noticed in my two-part Albert Belle Hall of Fame case, Part I ends inconclusively (Having been both too long and uneditable), and I neglect to explain why I believe Ken Griffey, Jr. to be a trustworthy source and why comparing doubles to home runs in power hitters is significant (Done, but not very clearly). The last two shall hopefully be dealt with in later posts.
Other errors, less significant, also pop up.
I hope readers will forgive me for having made these unfortunate errors, it having been a long and extensive argument. I recognize the human tendancy for error, but that makes it no less easier when actually committed. Hopefully, future posts will not contain this same level of errors.
On another note, given the amount of time elapsed from my last post ’til today, I plan to publish a number of "retro" articles to compensate for the missed time. My first will come today, an argument for Steve Garvey’s Hall candidacy that I intended to publish after Albert Belle’s, but was apparently too exhausted to do so. I hope it serves as a persuasive account of the legitimacy of Garvey’s Hall case, but then again, all persuasive writers hope that.
Recent Comments